McAfee Endpoint Protection Reviews. Chat with a G2 Advisor. Write a Review. Filter Reviews. Filter Reviews. Mcafee is probably the best Anti-virus program, the GUI is wonderful and simple to use. Using this product for baseline security for mac is a very good idea. I think when you get granular with custom settings. Dec 16, 2016 Solid endpoint security for Mac. By RRITMike on Dec 8, 2016 at 21:44 UTC. Next: Comodo VS Webroot. Only downside to this combo is that it requires the full Symantec Endpoint updates, network protection and antivirus, even if just using the network protection.
We've gone through 3 endpoint products for Mac now and have abandoned all 3 of them: Symantec: Abandoned at the time due to the inability to manage deployments and updates intelligently over a slow VPN concentrator. Kaspersky: Abandoned due to crippling performance issues on PCs (We RMA'd 300 licenses, not looking to dive back in even if the Mac client was OK) Vipre: Abandoned due to 9 months of development to get the client to work with El Capitan (didn't work when released) at which point we were given another non-working client.
Comodo Antivirus– Comodo Antivirus provides the state-of-the-art virus protection for Mac OS computer at no cost. It has an on-demand scanner, and ‘always on’ real-time protection and a constantly updated database of known viruses, Comodo Antivirus provides superior protection against zero-day malware.
Does anyone have any recommendations for a good endpoint, something that does real-time protection and scans for mac-specific threats? Something that, uh, actually works? Cloud based console would be a plus. We have some users with half a terabyte of content on their systems so a good, fast scan engine is a must.
John4865 wrote: Unless you have a regulatory need (PCI DSS) for an outdated, blacklist-based AV product, shop for something that is actually more than 40% effective in the current threat landscape. We went with Carbon Black, but also liked what we saw with Cylance. Yes, those products are a big step up in cost, and likely out of reach for shops with a dozen or so seats, but until we all start demanding products that actually work, the market is going to be slow to respond. FWIW, Trend (with the regular OfficeScan product) and Sophos (with the separate Intercept X) now have products that do similar things to the 'next-gen' AV products. I can't speak for others, though.
Big Green Man wrote: John4865 wrote: Unless you have a regulatory need (PCI DSS) for an outdated, blacklist-based AV product, shop for something that is actually more than 40% effective in the current threat landscape. We went with Carbon Black, but also liked what we saw with Cylance. Yes, those products are a big step up in cost, and likely out of reach for shops with a dozen or so seats, but until we all start demanding products that actually work, the market is going to be slow to respond.
FWIW, Trend (with the regular OfficeScan product) and Sophos (with the separate Intercept X) now have products that do similar things to the 'next-gen' AV products. I can't speak for others, though. Similar to some, but not all. Richard (Cylance) wrote: Big Green Man wrote: John4865 wrote: Unless you have a regulatory need (PCI DSS) for an outdated, blacklist-based AV product, shop for something that is actually more than 40% effective in the current threat landscape. We went with Carbon Black, but also liked what we saw with Cylance.
Yes, those products are a big step up in cost, and likely out of reach for shops with a dozen or so seats, but until we all start demanding products that actually work, the market is going to be slow to respond. FWIW, Trend (with the regular OfficeScan product) and Sophos (with the separate Intercept X) now have products that do similar things to the 'next-gen' AV products. I can't speak for others, though. Similar to some, but not all. Of course! I think every one of the next-gen products tackles detection in different ways, so it makes sense that they couldn't mimic all of them. We can provide what you're looking for without all the issues you had with previous vendors. Easy deployment, real-time protection (incl vs.
MacOS-specific threats), and a light system & network footprint. We always keep products up to date and compatible with the latest Windows/Mac systems as they officially release. We have update & deployment options to help mitigate traffic issues for slower connections and (along with our LiveGrid System) our endpoint products have options for cloud-based scanning to keep scan times short and sweet on those systems with large amounts of files.
Lots to consider here. We'll run some trials, though from what I'm hearing, paired with my own experience in the past, I think Sophos and Eset are the most likely candidates. We've got Vipre licensing for our PCs for the next couple years and we're happy with it on the PC side of things, but we only have 27 Macs to protect. Throwing AVG on there in the mean time so the systems at least have something running (honestly surprised that they don't have an endpoint product for Mac, the current business client, while limited in functionality, seems to have a solid engine).
When our current PC licenses expire, we'll probably look at unifying under something next gen. I use Sophos with Symantec Endpoint's Network threat detection. This way I get Sophos scanning and url protection with an IDS, as Sophos does not include an IDS in their product. It sounds strange but I love the multi vendor approach, when you can use one core product, like the full Sophos package and add in additional protections from other vendors, to supplement anything that is missing in the vendors's package. I also love the fact that I can run a full system scan from a secondary anti-malware vendor, from time to time. Only downside to this combo is that it requires the full Symantec Endpoint updates, network protection and antivirus, even if just using the network protection.
Compare Endpoint Security With Antivirus For Mac Windows 10
If you're still checking out your options, I would also suggest taking G DATA for a spin. G DATA Endpoint Protection supports Mac OS X 10.6 (Snow Leopard) and newer, and has very minimal impact on performance, even while scans are running. Not only does it proactively protect against Mac viruses, G DATA also provides additional protection for Windows PCs that are connected to your network. You can easily manage and monitor your installations (both Mac and Windows), clients' settings, and virus scans via the G DATA Administrator console.
Our website contains a full list of features and optional modules for extended functionality, should you need it: Feel free to and see G DATA in action for yourself. Of course, if you have any questions, I'm just a quick message away:).
Compare Norton Security vs. Symantec Endpoint Protection To successfully acquire the most helpful and productive IT Management Software for your business, you should compare products available on the market. For instance, here you may match Norton Security’s overall score of 9.8 against Symantec Endpoint Protection’s score of 8.7. You can also review their general user satisfaction: Norton Security (95%) vs. Symantec Endpoint Protection (84%).
Furthermore, you can assess their strengths and weaknesses feature by feature, including their terms and conditions and costs. By comparing products you are sure that you select the right software for your requirements. It goes without saying you must understand your unique needs to realize which software addresses those needs. At this time, the most popular products in our IT Security Software category are: Avira Antivirus Server, Cloudflare, Norton Security.